TSTP Solution File: SWV432^2 by Satallax---3.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Satallax---3.5
% Problem : SWV432^2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:25:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.82s 2.02s
% Output : Proof 1.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWV432^2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 23:16:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.82/2.02 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.82/2.02 % Mode: mode213
% 1.82/2.02 % Inferences: 5075
% 1.82/2.02 % SZS output start Proof
% 1.82/2.02 thf(ty_a, type, a : ($i>$o)).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(ty_eigen__2, type, eigen__2 : $i).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(ty_eigen__1, type, eigen__1 : $i).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(ty_b, type, b : ($i>$o)).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(ty_eigen__0, type, eigen__0 : $i).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(ty_rel, type, rel : ($i>$i>$o)).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(sP1,plain,sP1 <=> (a @ eigen__2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])])).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(sP2,plain,sP2 <=> (![X1:$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => (X1 @ X3))) => (X1 @ X2)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])])).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(sP3,plain,sP3 <=> (((rel @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2) => ((~((b @ eigen__2))) => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])])).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(sP4,plain,sP4 <=> (![X1:$i]:((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (b @ X2)))) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])])).
% 1.82/2.02 thf(sP5,plain,sP5 <=> (sP1 => (b @ eigen__2)),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(sP6,plain,sP6 <=> ((~((b @ eigen__2))) => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(sP7,plain,sP7 <=> ((rel @ eigen__1) @ eigen__2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(sP8,plain,sP8 <=> (b @ eigen__2),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(sP9,plain,sP9 <=> ((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))) => sP5),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(sP10,plain,sP10 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__2) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(sP11,plain,sP11 <=> (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((~((b @ X1))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (b @ X2))))))),introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP11])])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mfalse,definition,(mfalse = (^[X1:$i]:$false))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mtrue,definition,(mtrue = (^[X1:$i]:(~($false))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mnot,definition,(mnot = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mor,definition,(mor = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:((~((X1 @ X3))) => (X2 @ X3))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mand,definition,(mand = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(~(((X1 @ X3) => (~((X2 @ X3))))))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mimpl,definition,(mimpl = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X1))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_miff,definition,(miff = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mand @ ((mimpl @ X1) @ X2)) @ ((mimpl @ X2) @ X1)))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mbox,definition,(mbox = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X4) => (X2 @ X4)))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mdia,definition,(mdia = (^[X1:$i>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:(^[X3:$i]:(~((![X4:$i]:(((X1 @ X3) @ X4) => (~((X2 @ X4)))))))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mall,definition,(mall = (^[X1:individuals>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(![X3:individuals]:((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mexists,definition,(mexists = (^[X1:individuals>$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i]:(~((![X3:individuals]:(~(((X1 @ X3) @ X2)))))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mvalid,definition,(mvalid = (!!))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_msatisfiable,definition,(msatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~((![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_mcountersatisfiable,definition,(mcountersatisfiable = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(~(((!!) @ X1)))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_minvalid,definition,(minvalid = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(![X2:$i]:(~((X1 @ X2))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_atom,definition,(icl_atom = (mbox @ rel))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_princ,definition,(icl_princ = (^[X1:$i>$o]:X1))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_and,definition,(icl_and = mand)).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_or,definition,(icl_or = mor)).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_impl,definition,(icl_impl = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mbox @ rel) @ ((mimpl @ X1) @ X2)))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_true,definition,(icl_true = mtrue)).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_false,definition,(icl_false = mfalse)).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_says,definition,(icl_says = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mbox @ rel) @ ((mor @ X1) @ X2)))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_iclval,definition,(iclval = mvalid)).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(def_icl_impl_princ,definition,(icl_impl_princ = (^[X1:$i>$o]:(^[X2:$i>$o]:((mbox @ rel) @ ((mimpl @ X1) @ X2)))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(handoff,conjecture,(![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((b @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((~((a @ X4))))) => (b @ X4))))))))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((~((a @ X3))))) => (b @ X3))))))))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h0,negated_conjecture,(~((![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((b @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((a @ X4) => (b @ X4))))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((a @ X3) => (b @ X3)))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[handoff])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h1,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__0) @ X1) => ((![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((b @ X2))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((a @ X3) => (b @ X3))))))) => (![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((a @ X2) => (b @ X2))))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h2,assumption,(~((((rel @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1) => (sP11 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h3,assumption,((rel @ eigen__0) @ eigen__1),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h4,assumption,(~((sP11 => (![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1))))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h5,assumption,sP11,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h6,assumption,(~((![X1:$i]:(((rel @ eigen__1) @ X1) => ((a @ X1) => (b @ X1)))))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h7,assumption,(~((sP7 => sP5))),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h8,assumption,sP7,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h9,assumption,(~(sP5)),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h10,assumption,sP1,introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(h11,assumption,(~(sP8)),introduced(assumption,[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(1,plain,(~(sP4) | sP9),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(2,plain,((~(sP9) | ~(sP10)) | sP5),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(3,plain,(~(sP2) | sP4),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(4,plain,((~(sP5) | ~(sP1)) | sP8),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(5,plain,(~(sP11) | sP3),inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(6,plain,((~(sP3) | ~(sP7)) | sP6),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(7,plain,((~(sP6) | sP8) | sP10),inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(refl_axiom,axiom,(![X1:$i>$o]:(mvalid @ ((mimpl @ ((mbox @ rel) @ X1)) @ X1)))).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(8,plain,sP2,inference(preprocess,[status(thm)],[refl_axiom]).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(9,plain,$false,inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h11,h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0])],[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,h5,h8,h10,h11])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(10,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h9,h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h10,h11])],[h9,9,h10,h11])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(11,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h8,h9])],[h7,10,h8,h9])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(12,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h6,h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h7]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__2)],[h6,11,h7])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(13,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h4,h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h5,h6])],[h4,12,h5,h6])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(14,plain,$false,inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h2,h1,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h3,h4])],[h2,13,h3,h4])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(15,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h2]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h1,14,h2])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(16,plain,$false,inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h1]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h0,15,h1])).
% 1.82/2.03 thf(0,theorem,(![X1:$i]:(![X2:$i]:(((rel @ X1) @ X2) => ((~((~((![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((b @ X3))) => (![X4:$i]:(((rel @ X3) @ X4) => ((~((~((a @ X4))))) => (b @ X4))))))))))) => (![X3:$i]:(((rel @ X2) @ X3) => ((~((~((a @ X3))))) => (b @ X3)))))))),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[16,h0])).
% 1.82/2.03 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------